Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian Greek Empire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Article defaults to keep. Joyous 16:00, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

Serbian Greek Empire
Somewhere between advocacy and advertising. No independent verifiability - David Gerard 01:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete A splendidly subversive counter to all that "sons of Homer" mythology of modern "birthplace-of-democracy" Greece, nevertheless! --Wetman 01:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I think they'd need Tito mark II to make it work, personal thoughts aside - Delete on the grounds of advertising. - Greaser 01:35, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep after searching online one can easily find sites of support. Just so long as the site for the so-called BPPO be deleted.
 * Please sign your votes, IP 68.148.93.27. Good to see you're trying to improve the article, but leave the VfD notice alone please. Andrewa 06:43, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough information in it --PatGallacher 02:07, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - It appears to be a real concept with some currency. We can always add more information (that's what Wikipedia is all about). It will need some work on POV. -Rholton 06:00, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete - after further looking, it seems that some of the web pages I took to be an indication of currency were referring to this Wikipedia article. -Rholton 16:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unsure. Certainly needs work. But how notable is this movement? I'd be surprised if it didn't have some currency, but that's speculation. No vote as yet. Andrewa 06:47, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If anyone can prove that this movement is notable, I'll change. But as of now, it looks like mere speculation, not notable. Thanks for catching that, Thryduulf. Khanartist 09:18, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
 * above vote is from Khanartist who appears to have made the five-tilde typo. Thryduulf 11:25, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see this comming to pass, but if it is a real movement then it deserves an article. weak keep. Thryduulf 11:26, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, borderline. article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 00:01, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article is obviously bringing forth many interesting discussions. I see the potential ; however, it should continue to be expanded. I personally, happen to advocate the cause. Serbohellas 4;24, Jan 20 2005 (GMT)
 * Note: the above vote originally by User:Maninajar diff, who has only one edit. It was re-signed as "Serbohellas" by User:66.222.216.137 diff, who also voted below.  dbenbenn | talk 06:44, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. I'm sure that this general ideology has been around for a while. If it's the only page on the internet talking about it, it just means that no one has bothered writing about it. It still seems notable. CPS 23:10, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this "nationalist" rant. Seig Heil Y'all! Edeans 00:38, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Crackpot rant. Delete. Martg76 05:25, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep one can easily find information about the movement, if not in English it can easily be found in Serbian and Greek languages. -- Slav
 * Note: at the time of voting, User:Slav had 3 main-namespace edits. dbenbenn | talk 06:44, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. No racist views. No extremist remarks. I see no faults.My IP:User:66.222.216.137*Note: I'm not a member, but I have been around wikipedia for a while. My first vote :)
 * Delete: This issue/movement is certainly not prominent enough to be in Wikipedia. There are no political parties or known organizations that are even mentioning this issue (and I looked for them, too). The author of the article is probably just trying to promote this movement. --Dejan Cabrilo 23:06, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.