Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenata Flowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Serenata Flowers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article of a company not meeting WP:NORG, based upon cited references (based purely on PR websites) plus one article demonstrating that the company resorts to spamming tactics. Coincidentally, article creator has been blocked for spamming/promotion. Nick Moyes (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Article created by a WP:SPA user that is promotional and nothing in depth about subject from any source. I won't completely agree that cited references are "Purely on PR websites". Metro is not PR website. Edidiong (talk) 20:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Which reference was to the Metro, ? Can't seem to find it now. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This was undisclosed paid editing, pure and simple. It has no place here. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.