Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serengetee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Serengetee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As an IP pointed out on talk page, the article seems to be promotional. Only 1 RS used. Nanophosis (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  23:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  23:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Could care less what is in the article, only Forbes and HuffPo seem to go into enough depth, 1 short of passing the GNG. cinco deL3X1 ◊distænt write◊  23:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. The Forbes reference is misleading; it's not a Forbes editorial piece, it's just a Forbes-hosted "contributor" blog. You or I could get one tomorrow. Zero good sources to support a WP:CORP pass here.  A  Train talk 22:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * delete lacks sufficient coverage to meet notability requirements. Dloh cier ekim 's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.