Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, snow close. While the original creator's passion is admirable, Wikipedia is not a place for things that you made up one day. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Serenism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unfortunately, the subject of this article lacks notability. An AfD is being placed per User_talk:TechLoveDrug, and is it reccommended that any voters check this articles talk page too. Benboy00 (talk) 09:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment On google's first page, the only related thing that comes up is []. Benboy00 (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * this may be more relevant. bobrayner (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete; Wikipedia isn't for things you made up one day., if you want to achieve sweeping political change, best to start somewhere else. bobrayner (talk) 12:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, for the same reasons as in the proposed deletion that was disputed. This is a neologism that's apparently been started on Reddit, and is not a notable political view or philosophy. If that were to come to pass, we would have an article about it after that happens, not before. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:40, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment If I were you (the creator), I would instead have this on a blog, which is better for numerous reasons, one of which is that only you can edit it, another being that it wont be deleted. Benboy00 (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Also, this is literally turning into a list of various political terms and their meanings, all of which are covered in their own articles. Benboy00 (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A neologism naming some original research.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  16:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Effectively an original research essay. As things stand, it has no notability. AllyD (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment WP:SNOWBALL? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benboy00 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no reliable sources for the ideology at described in the article. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON and there is no prejudice to recreation if multiple in-depth reliable sources become available. There is a political ideology called Literary serenism, but this article has nothing to do with that. --Mark viking (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I note that it is categorised as a Neologism: it obviously fails WP:NEO. With no sources, my guess is that it is also OR.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.