Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serge Pustelnik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:48, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Serge Pustelnik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This long article actually fails Wikipedia's general notability guidelines.

The entire article fails to explain what the person is.

And he neither in news, nor in books. Marvellous Spider -Man 17:05, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Seems to have had some bit part in a FINRA investigation, but neither that, nor his other jobs and events meet GNG for a stand alone article. Reads like a promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete indeed, there's no actual claim of noteworthiness at all - David Gerard (talk) 09:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as promotional CV with no claim to notability. Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST nor is it LinkedIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable law student. He may well soon parlay this to a position where he is actually notable, but he has not done so yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.