Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Lemberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  13:21, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Sergei Lemberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Brief mentions and quotes. Who considers the subject "prominent" is not explained, neither is the claim that he is known for "pioneering" lawsuits supported by any of the sources. Vexations (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:47, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I'm the original poster, and while he's not a judge nor politician, there are several national media article which cite him, a Fox News tv interview which featured him, he had the first self-driving car lawsuit, is quite active in consumer rights lawsuits, and was fleetingly mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rightscorp I removed the terms "pioneering" or "prominent", and added 2 refs, maybe those will help. I look forward to hearing other votes. Randfal2 (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This article needs a lot of work, but I do see how it can be considered notable. Depending on the outcome, maybe it could be moved to a draft to be fixed up? Handoto (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The lawsuit about the autonomous cehivle is perhaps notable, but notthe lawyer in the case.  DGG ( talk ) 06:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per above. Nothing says the lawyer meets the NOTE guidelines.  Springee (talk) 15:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep A notable attorney who's article can be expanded some more with the sources like law.com, reuters.com that prove him notable. Sdmarathe (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.