Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Bushuyev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Sergey Bushuyev

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any non-trivial independent coverage for this person. All the links cited in this article are either to press releases or 404 pages. Appears to fail the general notability guideline. Noisalt (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, even if you take what's in the article as given, except perhaps for the publication record. Hairhorn (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. If you take what's in the article as given then the subject is pretty obviously notable: "an award as the best professor of Ukraine in 1987". Phil Bridger (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. GS cites are 7, 1, 1. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Comment. I'm not aware that Google Scholar has any significant coverage of work in Russian and Ukrainian, especially when the search is done in the Latin alphabet. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has an entry in a print encyclopedia, showing that the outside world considers him to be an encyclopedic subject, which is the very basis of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep If he's notable enough for a print encyclopedia, he's notable enough for here. Edward321 (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep He's already had a print encyclopedia entry about him, notable enough. Netalarm   talk  00:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Presence in a print encyclopedia warrants sufficient notability. Byronwrites (talk) 04:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Some print encyclopedias like Marquis Who's Who are not considered to convey notability due to their vanity press connotations. I don't know about this one as I can't read the language. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC).
 * It's authored by the Національна академія наук України (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine). —Noisalt (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Notability generally requires multiple sources. —Noisalt (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.