Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Michel (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Sergio Michel
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Musician whose has had "trending" tracks but appears to have never acheived the degree of success reqired for Wikipedia notability. Despite many refs, none seem to demonstrate notability in any depth. Reads like a puff piece  Velella  Velella Talk 10:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - while I agree that the article certainly needs copyediting for promotional tone, I think that the references indicate that the subject of the article has received sufficient notability to warrant a Wikipedia article. The article does require cleanup but I don't think it's a WP:BLOWITUP-level case.   Dr Strauss   talk  10:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although my saying something here may not matter but I would just like to say that I've found Wikipedia articles about similar artists and local personalities. Many of whom have purchased PR and built up self promotional image that is not entirely justified by their true achievements. This article and the references provided herewith do not represent one such case. --Koustave (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's not the substance needed for an actually convincing article in independent notability and that's the main concern there. SwisterTwister   talk  22:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.