Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Sartorelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Sources have been found/added and the article has been cleaned up (non-admin closure)  D u s t i SPEAK!! 03:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Sergio Sartorelli

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The only source is an autobio; as such, fails WP:BIO. Ironholds (talk) 15:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 18:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong delete no real coverage of this person . LibStar (talk) 07:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added a reference, and I think that the book references found Sartorelli" here indicate notability. - Eastmain (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I Still don't think it passes WP:BIO. References talk about Sartorelli in minor, minor detail; standard form is that "Sergio Sartorelli is the designer of X, which features, among other things, adjustable windows, etc etc etc" for 2 pages. That doesn't really count as significant coverage. Ironholds (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The nomination fails WP:BEFORE as there are clearly other sources for this notable designer. I have performed some cleanup on the article and added another source. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to satisfy the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a copvio/plagiarism.  Majorly  talk  18:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. copvio[sic]/plagiarism of what? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This.  Majorly  talk  22:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not anymore. Dreadstar  ☥  06:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 16:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - seems borderline to me, but there are some sources available like (in German) and  (in Italian), which are probably enough for notability. Robofish (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, meets minimum requirements of WP:BIO, including the 'enduring historical record' of his design work on automobiles such as the Type 34 Karmann Ghia, Ford OSI 20 M Coupe, the Fiat 2300 S Coup, Fiat 126, and the Fiat Ritmo, among others. Dreadstar  ☥  19:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep based fon his work indesign, for which there are adequate sources.    DGG ( talk ) 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets threshold for inclusion. Notable as a designer, and per DGG, adequate sources.(olive (talk) 01:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep Passes WP:BIO enough 3rd party coverage. RP459 (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.