Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Series60-Remote


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  00:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Series60-Remote

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources, nothing to indicate this is notable Jac 16888  Talk 16:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I am using the program over some time now. The original developer seams to take a break. There were no activate after July 2012. But still series60-remote is stable and can be used for S60 mobile phones. It is also included in some important Linux distributions. I am now starting to use the Open Mobile Suite and if Lukas Hetzenecker does not want to continue his really good work than I will do that. So why do you want do delete it? User:Ypid 19:05, 12 May 2013 (CEST)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:37, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Because it demonstrates no notability through the use of reliable 3rd party references-- Jac 16888 Talk 17:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Is not the diploma thesis that I cited recently a reliable source? User:Ypid 21:19, 05 May 2013 (CEST)
 * It was written by the person who created the software, so basically no-- Jac 16888 Talk 19:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete: I agree with Jac 16888  on this one. Not enough notability and sources are not reliable. We need 3rd party sources not sources from the creator of the software. Most of the sources are links to places where you can buy it or they are in a different language. Newsjunky12 (talk). 1:42 PM EST, May 20, 2013.


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  15:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.