Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seriya Gebru (singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete as a hoax by a serial sockpuppeteer. Max Semenik (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Seriya Gebru (singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced. At least some other pages on this person have been speedily deleted. Contains unverified research (such as the Halloween Returns parts) which appears inaccurate. Largely paraphrased from http://www.seriyaxo.com/#!bio/c1o5 JamesG5 (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Noting that all 3 of the accounts saying "Keep" are brand new here on Wikipedia and the only thing 2 of the 3 have done involves the page in question. Would like to see some opinions by others. JamesG5 (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

If anything, I believe some parts may need to be rewritten, but I don't believe it deserves deletion. At most, tags should be placed on the page. Knightsofthetiger (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The article could be improved, but the person does basically meet standards for notability having released a somewhat notable album on a major label. As far as the "Halloween Returns" issue, not much information has been revealed about the film, if this person has stated that they will appear in the film, I see no reason why it shouldn't be credible. Ladygagahouse (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Possibly so, I put this up for discussion rather than the speedy deletes that were done for previous pages on this individual because I thought it merited review, but please don't remove the template until there's some consensus. JamesG5 (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Article should be cleaned up, but individual meets WP:NM with the Bad Boy Records album, since it was an imprint of Warner Music Group at the time. Additionally, according to the individual's site, her second major release is set to be released on November 30th through Bad Boy, which is now an imprint of Sony Music Entertainment. Logicequalslogical (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as basically the "record label notability" would be only the lifeline saving this as I simply found no minimally acceptable coverage to suggest a better article. I wish I could say keep but there's simply nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.