Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serpico (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 07:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Serpico (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Band with just one release it seems. Wgolf (talk) 02:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  03:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Only having released one album isn't really a good reason for deletion. The band have received significant coverage in reliable sources. In addition to the sources in the article I found this. --Michig (talk) 07:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. On the contrary, only having one album is a perfectly good reason for deletion if it is their only claim to notability, as it is here. Of all of the references, including the link found by User:Michig, the only one that is apparently about the band itself and isn't just a review of the debut album is the reference to an article in the Burton Mail, which is a 404 (and can't be found through the Internet Archive either). That falls short of WP:BAND#1 and WP:GNG in my view, and one band on a non-notable label isn't enough to meet WP:BAND#5. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 18:40, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 01:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - the band seems notable, for their coverage on notable sources. Karlhard (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please explain which of the WP:BAND criteria you believe they meet, and how. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 20:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.