Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serratus (virology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Serratus (virology)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lacks notability, creator has a major COI TheManInTheBlackHat   (Talk)  21:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Adding in a vote per format. See my previous reply above for rationale. Ababaian (talk) 04:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Symbol support vote.svg Support deletion Silikonz 💬 21:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The purpose of creating a wiki page for the Serratus project is for the integration of the underlying database to the relevant virology / bioinformatics pages. The goal is to increase connectivity with what is the world's richest collection of RNA virology sequences.
 * For notability: see Altmetric for this work (https://nature.altmetric.com/details/121608850). It is in the top 5% of all research output and in the 99th percentile for attention, including reporting from several news organizations
 * - Canadian CBC: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/supercomputer-virus-study-disease-1.6345158
 * - National Geographic: https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/descubiertos-mas-130000-virus-gracias-a-nueva-herramienta-informatica_17807
 * - Science Magazine: https://www.science.org/content/article/new-dangers-computers-uncover-100-000-novel-viruses-old-genetic-data
 * For COI: This article has no more COI than most other bioinformatics software/project pages and a large volume of the scientific edits on wikipedia.
 * - see contributors for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_bioinformatics_software
 * If there are specific issues with the neutrality of the article I am open to suggestions to address this. Ababaian (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ababaian I would love if you could added these sources you are listing into the article because as of right now there is only one source linked. TheManInTheBlackHat   (Talk)  21:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added two of the news citations. Any other suggestions? Ababaian (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * These sources certainly boost the case for notability. I'm going to leave the discussion going to see what others say. TheManInTheBlackHat   (Talk)  23:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. seems sufficiently notable based on
 * https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/supercomputer-virus-study-disease-1.6345158 https://bc.ctvnews.ca/the-hope-is-we-re-not-caught-off-guard-again-b-c-researcher-says-of-discovery-of-9-new-coronavirus-species-1.5756953 plus the National Geographic article linked above. CT55555  (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notability is well-established by reliable independent sources. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.