Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serve Georgia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Serve Georgia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested prod, no improvement to referencing. Contested on reason of "came 2nd in election in the table so clearly very notable" Party is a miniscule part of a massive Georgian political coalition, and that coalition came in second. The party has zero presence in national parliament. Current referencing and anything I can find shows a complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. Reminder that organizations are not inherently notable nor do they inherit notability from a notable person associated with it (ie. the single person in a regional government currently elected while affiliated with the party.) IceBergYYC (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Georgia (country). IceBergYYC (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The party does not have a member in parliament, meaning this is PROMO. Small political group. I can't find overage of them, some things from the State of Georgia in the USA. Oaktree b (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.