Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service data adaptation protocol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Service data adaptation protocol

 * – ( View AfD View log )

De-PROD'd with a note that there are sources on Google Scholar. In fact, there are hits on Google Scholar, which is not the same thing at all. All of these hits are simply trivial mentions of the term in the context of larger technical concepts. They are not significant coverage of the concept of a "service data adaptation protocol". &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on the sources presented below I think this actually does have sufficient coverage and am striking my nomination. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete To avoid WP:FORK issues, the topic would be best covered within the existing 3GPP article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * , I no longer feel the deletion rationale applies - are you willing to strike so it can be withdrawn? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Normally I'm in favor of merging to avoid deletion, but per that article, there's hundreds of these technical standards - it really wouldn't be workable. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I don't know about mobile telephony to comment from a technical point of view. From an encyclopedic point of view, would a List of 3GPP standards be reasonable? User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 01:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 04:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC) SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the significant coverage available in reliable, independent, secondary sources.
 * The first two sources appear to basically be single-sentence mentions; the other two sources are single paragraphs. I don't think it constitutes the kind of WP:SIGCOV necessary for a standalone article - although merging to a list as 力 suggests would be suitable IMO. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The first reference discusses the application of SDAP over three pages (205-207). The second source is a paper on an implementation of SDAP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 13:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize, you are correct, and I've struck my comment. In particular I should have realized the second source would be using "SDAP" and not the full name of the protocol throughout. I've also struck my nom and asked the other delete commenter to strike to allow withdrawl, as I no longer feel that the deletion rationale applies. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.