Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesan Thaddeus Fabamise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | spill the beans _ 19:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Sesan Thaddeus Fabamise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:ACADEMIC. He is just doing his job as a lecturer at Afe Babalola University. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I found one paper with five cites in GScholar on a search for Fabamise. That gives him a h-index of 1, which is below the average even for a (full) professor of law (which 2.8 according to LSE). So that closes that particular route to notability. On the other hand, I do know that GScholar does not give complete coverage of all academics and all academic publications. James500 (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

--- the page creator has been indef blocked. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabnite. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: After searches on JSTOR and Google Scholar, plus news and miscellaneous sources, it is very unlikely that the subject meets WP:PROF. Esquivalience t 01:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. The first 3 references are standard biographical profiles, none of them really independent. Even if they were, they couldn't establish notability as common resumes (several sentences are copy/pasted from ref #3 btw.). Ref #4 includes a 1-sentence quote over a relatively minor incident ("minor" not for the affected school of course, but on a greater encyclopedic scale). Google search reveals nothing in-depth. GermanJoe (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and above editors. Can find nothing to substantiate notability on search engines.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.