Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to WAY 79. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BK. The only sources for which the book series is the subject are all sale sites. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 15:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment page deleted by creator, and made redirect page. Fairly pointless afd, it could have been much easier by discussion first. Afd first is never a very good idea. Other editors might have other solutions. JarrahTree 23:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment - please read this! Page content has in effect been merged into parent article - the nominator has made a valid point about this item, however, to keep this afd open, when the creator of the article agrees with its removal, an WP:AGF removal of the Afd, and a blank and Prod is within process, to do so. JarrahTree 07:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Willbb234, I am not sure what you are trying to achieve. "Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series" is a reasonable term to use as a redirect to WAY 79, and I have not seen you deny this. It appears that the only thing you're insisting on is that JarrahTree wasn't allowed (?) to blank the page and make the redirect--well, the easiest and most non-confrontational way to get what you both want is to simply withdraw the nomination and accept a redirect. Simple. All you have to say is "OK" and we can close this., if "hohum" means "this content merged from Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series, which is what you say here and what I think you are saying on the nominator's talk page, then please make that clear. (There is no benefit to being cryptic here or elsewhere.) Please see WP:MERGETEXT and WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Now, Willbb234, can we close this as merge and redirect and move on? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 17:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.