Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sessions@AOL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Tito xd (?!?) 01:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Sessions@AOL
Advertising, delete. ComCat 03:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. ComCat 00:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep This is not advertisting. Sessions @ AOL is a well known avenue of performance for artists. OmegaWikipedia 03:46, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep (Weak) It's along the lines of World Cafe type venues but I do agree with the nominator that we should be careful that it doesn't turn into advertising at least. Nor should it be a laundry list. gren グレン 05:48, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! I mentioned this in article before but I didn't bother to link it because I figured it would never have an article. I'm pleasantly surprised to see that it now has one. Everyking 11:33, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable live performance series. Secretlondon 15:01, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as extremely notable. I don't think it's currently advertising. Besides, if the article were advertising, in the case of an article like this the article could be rewritten instead of simply thrown out. I'm trying to assume good faith, but I am starting to wonder if this was a bad-faith nom, especially with the large list of other articles you have also dumped onto AfD lately. --Jacquelyn Marie 15:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Come on, now. This is not advertising; it's a legitimate venue. - Sensor 00:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I removed the list of artists Zeimusu | Talk page 00:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with AOL notable series on the internet. User:UrineForGas 13:23, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Even though I know the nomination was withdrawn, I actually needed this article!!! Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:17, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.