Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth (surname)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 23:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Seth (surname)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced one-liner about a surname that has been tagged for 2 years without improvement. No indication that this surname is notable nor the sweeping claim is properly applied to any living people who may have this surname. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per Carlos. Even if there is a source to prove the claim made, no need for an article about every surname in the world.  Mandsford (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Carlos. If someone can source this comment, maybe it can go elsewhere (disambig page for the phrase seth?), but isnt there a rule about <1k stubs being unsuitable for article status?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.