Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Abramson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (Non-admin closure) as per general consensus.- Ravichandar 07:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Seth Abramson

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic material. Advertising/promotion. Non-notable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agrofe (talk • contribs) 2008/03/17 14:06:36
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Week keep There's quite a bit of cruft here, but there may also be a diamond underneath.   He seems notable to me and the article definitely has a lot of varied sources.   My concern is that a lot of the article -- and claim of notability -- rests upon various blogs, which are NOT reliable.     On the balance of both the credit and debit columns, I'm leaning ever-so-slightly to the keep side.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 18:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - but a lot of the fluff (blogs and obscure little magazine credits) has to get cleared out, so we can see the substance, if any. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, as above. I feel he might just be notable, but there is a lot of cruft that needs to be burned out of the article first.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.