Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Goldman (businessman) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 01:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Seth Goldman (businessman)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural relist per deletion review at Deletion review/Log/2015 May 15. I remain neutral. Valoem  talk   contrib  20:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy/snow keep - profile in Washington Post, interview in Forbes twice in the same year, Reader's Digest be like wut?, he hits up the ad men like a Mad Man, his business is tight, no foolin, he droppin sick beats at NPR and on the mean streets and on the Wall StreetJ while reppin' the US of A Today. They see him rollin', articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/06/24/honest-tea-gmo-labeling.aspx they hatin']! The GoldMan be addressing Congress like a baller but he keeps it real cuz his life is dope and of course, F.B.N. LIFE.  —Мандичка YO 😜 01:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * might be worth adding a few of those to the article? Liam987   talk  19:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. I'm at a complete loss as to why this was nominated for deletion and actually passed - this should be further scrutinized as an AfD that went wrong. I don't see how anyone could say there is no evidence of notability unless they did not actually search, or, their search term was specifically "Seth Goldman (businessman)" which, obviously, is going to fail. No reliable source is going to refer to him as Seth Goldman (businessman). —Мандичка YO 😜 21:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I was also rather surprised. I've seen quite a few nominations closed well before a consensus is reached (I don't see anyone could think that one neutral vote and one delete vote is a consensus), but I understand that frequently AfD's are open for a long times with very little activity, as this one had been, so I can understand the rush to close them quickly. Liam987   talk  23:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per Wikimandia. Absolutely meets WP:BIO. Liam987   talk  19:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject in question is notable. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 01:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per my rewrite and the numerous sources found by . There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Seth Goldman to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 02:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The sources listed above show they pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.