Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Unger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Seth Unger

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason Syntheticlife4m (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC) This doesn't apply to Wikipedia's guidelines for notoriety for living biographies. Looking at the references provided, this appears to be a momentary person of minimal local fame, not a major political figure or celebrity with any potential of lasting importance.


 * Object Don't blow up the house before its built. Article needs more citations and references; not deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.157.254 (talk) 03:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - As above. Also, it looks a lot like this was a false alarm - the user who created this is a brand new user whose only contributions are a few select AfD's. Ulterior motive? Luminifer (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. As with the other instances of Syntheticlife4m's recent AfD spree (many of which have other single-purpose IP's with "object" comments), this one was not linked into the daily AfD logs (step 3 of an AfD nomination). I have done that now. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Either founding a notable organization is notable enough for inclusion or it is notable enough to warrant a redirect to said organization from the name of the founder. Deletion would be improper either way. - Mgm|(talk) 10:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per 24.105.157.254, sources seem good to me. Taelus (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep´This AfD looks like a vendetta.201.65.92.42 (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.