Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth van Hooland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Seth van Hooland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:ACADEMIC: no major awards, no fellowship in prestigious societies, no distinguished professorships. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  15:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per h-index of 6.  Jinkinson   talk to me  16:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Unfortunately premature. (And thanks for G Scholar index info - just discovered I'm a h-19. Yet still not notable. :-) LaMona (talk) 16:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;I just turned h-11 and I'm definitely not notable. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citation record (per his Google scholar profile) far below threshold for WP:PROF. No other evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.