Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sethaphile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:52, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Sethaphile
Article asserts notability, but the claim seems to fail. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 03:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my nomination. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 03:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete a7 per nom.
 * Speedy A7. Royboycrashfan 04:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 06:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User removed afD nom, delete, nn. Jawz 06:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't believe the article can be speedied under A7 as it asserts notability (as silly as the assertion may be). As such, this AfD should focus on determining whether or not the article should remain on Wikipedia.  Voting Speedy delete isn't really an option here. - C HAIRBOY  (☎) 07:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable vanity biography. An assertion of notability is a statement requiring judgement - simply saying "I am notable because I am a human" would not be an assertion of notability.  So it is reasonable for others to disagree with whether the statements in the article constitue an assertion of notability.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-31 11:22Z 
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 20:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom and A7. -Aaron 23:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fancruft. Catamorphism 07:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.