Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Deadly Sins (series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the so far uncontested claims of meeting GNG. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Seven Deadly Sins (series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no refs in the article except for a link to the website of the author, and I was not able to find references demonstrating notability. Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Trying this out, I find, , . So, she seems to be getting reasonable, ongoing press. Jclemens (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep looks like Simon & Schuster just reprinted these in a multivolume compilation. Gotta say, the false positives are pretty hard to filter out for a really common series title like that, but it looks like a case where the article fails to use coverage clearly available online.  Failing that, merge to the author's web page, because these clearly exist and aren't just self-published. Jclemens (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK, although the series doesn't appear to have been reviewed as a whole, there are numerous reviews available on individual titles, article lists 6 of them in the references section. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.