Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Devils Moonshine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Seven Devils Moonshine

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BAND not covered in reliable sources. No singles or albums have charted nationally. Available coverage is promotional in nature and does not discuss the topic significantly and in depth.---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Fails WP:NALBUM not covered in reliable sources. The recording has not appeared on any country's national music chart. The recording has not been certified gold or higher in at least one country. Available coverage is promotional in nature and does not discuss the topic significantly and in depth. Steve Quinn (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - This AfD is about an album, so notability should be evaluated under WP:NALBUM. Instead the nominator used WP:NBAND and seems to be claiming that the band is not notable (they are notable). The nominator should straighten this out, or else the AfD should be closed due to poor reasoning. See #1 and #3 at WP:CSK. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The problem has been fixed. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:35, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Virgin Steele discography as is usually done for lesser-known albums. This one got a little pre-release publicity as seen in the Blabbermouth article that is already cited, but then it came and went with little outside notice except for occasional blog-like reviews at sites like Metal Observer (which I am not allowed to link here because it's blacklisted). ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment As nominator I agree with redirect per . ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: I found some reliable sources which talk about the box set:, , , , and . With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 15:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Astig's list of sources. QuietHere (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:NALBUM with sources presented by Astig. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.