Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Editions of the Divine Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete - copyvio (non-admin closure) - 2 ... says you, says me 14:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Seven Editions of the Divine Law

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This purports to be a Christian theological concept, but I can find absolutely no coverage of it in reliable sources. It appears to be complete original research on the part of the author. Robofish (talk) 04:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I do not recognize this nor can find any reference to it. I suspect as well that it is original research. Vicenarian  (T · C) 06:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NOR and V. - 2 ... says you, says me 07:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:OR springs to mind. Trevor Marron (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unreferenced, apparently original research. John Carter (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – unreferenced essay that appears to be the writer's conjectural interpretation of the Bible. KuyaBriBri Talk 14:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I actually like this, as a tract or sermon topic.  It remains original theological speculation. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This information seems to come form the Thompson Chain-Reference Bible , which would make it a copyright violation, not original research. Edward321 (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Based on the above information, I've tagged for speedy, G12. Vicenarian  (T · C) 04:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.