Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Lions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sole keep argument disputed, and that keep argument acknowledges source reliability problems&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Seven Lions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

CSD A7 removed by creator but  the added refs are not  WP:RS and still  do  not  add up  to  notability  per WP:BAND. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. It certainly isn't an A7, but apart from the brief SPIN piece, I couldn't find much else, which is surprising for someone who has remixed for some very high profile artists and who has been played quite a bit on BBC radio in the UK. If anyone can come up with more coverage I may reconsider. --Michig (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 03:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep. A number of blog posts, and not much else apart from a few other (individually insubstantial) mentions in what may be RSs. If these (and others, if they're available) are no good, then I guess I'll reconsider to weak delete per WP:TOOSOON. -- Trevj (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I doubt they would be considered reliable sources. --Michig (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:26, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  05:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.