Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Mysteries of Fudo High


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 17:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Seven Mysteries of Fudo High

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List of plot elements from the Kindaichi Case Files series. Completely unsourced plot point summary from a select number of chapters/episodes. A merge doesn't make sense to me as the series is too big to focus on "episodic" plot points and I don't see any need for a redirect. SephyTheThird (talk) 01:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't seem notable and doesn't seem to be written like a Wikipedia article. Catmando999   Check out his talk page!  01:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a Wikia, completely unsourced, and full of original research. This is from a single episode? Why not make it an episode article then? However, given that it is unsourced and not notable, this won't happen. It isn't even a theme of the series. There are plenty of other anime series like Haunted Junction which have stories about seven supernatural wonders at their school. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Full story: The series is basically lots of mysteries that run for a number of chapters/episodes and then are done with, much like Conan. Originally this particular mystery was published as 10 chapters across 2 volumes in japan, but as the english edition recompiled the chapters so each book contained a single "case", it was one volume in english. The anime adapted it into the first three episodes of the original anime. It's essentially an episodic article but the episode itself is not notable. SephyTheThird (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable mysteries lacking coverage in reliable sources. Opencooper (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.