Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Oaks (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Seven Oaks (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

nn Lenerd (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. The nominating user did not succeed in stating his reasons, so nomination may be defective. However, there are no third party sources confirming notability, and the magazine seems to be defunct, as most recent content on its web site dates to 2008. Jonathanwallace (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - non-notable, no sources in article meeting WP:V. Icalanise (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Doesn't appear to have ever really gotten off the ground. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.