Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 10:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Seven Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can find no evidence of notability. The majority of the "references" cited in the article do not even mention Seven Records. All of the others either just give a brief credit to the company or are pages on the company's own web site. Not one of them is an independent source which tells us any more than that the company produced a particular record. Searching for "Seven Records" on Google there are loads of hits to pages that mention those two words together but have nothing to do with this company (including pages on other companies such as Phase Seven Records and Fifty Seven Records Inc) but among the first 80 Google hits as far as I can see almost the only ones mentioning this company are pages of its own (its web site, its MySpace and Facebook pages). There is also a page on www.vinylsearcher.com listing records from "Seven Records", but all it does is give a list of records on the label, so it does not constitute significant coverage. In short, there is no evidence of notability anywhere. None of the bands whose records are released on this label seems to be particularly significant either (though of course even if they were that would not automatically confer notability on the record company). JamesBWatson (talk) 11:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vast majority of references don't look like reliable sources, the few others are the most trivial of mentions. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.