Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Worlds Index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Seven Worlds Index
Not notable, thanks to Kuyabribri to completing this nomGnevin (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomination on behalf of, as it appears Twinkle broke. I assume the nomination rationale is along the lines of unverifiable and/or lack of notability. I will ask Gnevin for clarification.

For my part, I am neutral. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 22:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete because Google searches of books and scholar do not show the expression, or the index, being used. It does make sense however.Wolfview (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. & Wolfview. The only source listed is a print reference that provides no page number(s). Completely fails WP:V.--JayJasper (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.