Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven dirty words



Again, should not be published in public domain. It is content not suitable for an encyclopedia. Introductionneeded (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose -- See WP:DEL. Per #14 there, see WP:NOTCENSORED. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. And strongly advise that Introductionneeded reads the Deletion policy before nominating any more articles. Wikipedia doesn't delete articles because they contain subject matter that somebody doesn't like. Nominations like this just waste everyone's time. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep — Proposal is not policy-based. Wikipedia is not censored. Centre Left Right  ✉ 21:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep no policy reason given for its deletion. Seems to be a "I don't like it" argument. See WP:N as what articles what notable for standalone articles. See also Wikipedia is not censored.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.   Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.   Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Okay fine it can be kept up, does not need to be deleted.Introductionneeded (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That's magnanimous. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)