Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 04:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education
Summary of original, non-notable work. Possible copyvio as well. BoojiBoy 22:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * delete nonnotable POV summary. --Samael775 22:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * delete --Hraefen Talk 22:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete willing to listen if the creator mounts a defense, but this is pretty much just copied out of the referene article, isn't it? Opabinia regalis 23:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an self-help manual. SM247 My Talk  00:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyright violation. The whole article is preambled by, "The following is quoted from the work of..."--Gay Cdn 02:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as author. I made a mistake by posting this article.  It does seem like it is a copyright violation.  While I think that the article does have merit (the work is used in educational circles, it was published in a book and has been cited in over 600 academic papers - many in prominent peer reviewed journals), it would need to be rewritten.  I don't have time to do that right now. (Teryx 16:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.