Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventh-day Adventist Academy schools in Puerto Rico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''redirect to List of Seventh-day Adventist academies and elementary schools, as merging has already taken place. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Seventh-day Adventist Academy schools in Puerto Rico

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

List containing only contact information for external schools, with no internal wiki links whatsoever. Originally G11 tagged but the creator removed the phone and website info (And the G11). Doesn't fall under G11 anymore, but it is still not the kind of page to keep around. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 09:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete par being the nominator Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 09:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No links, references, pictures or information that could give viewers more of an insight into the respective schools. This is just a dull and un-informative address list. If you ask me, we're probably better-off sticking to the Puerto Rican version of Yellow Pages.  A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 10:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am cleaning this up and converting to a DMB page. However, with some introductory text this can easily become an article. It also provides a convenient repository for information on nn schools. This page should have been given time to develop before being proposed for deletion. Proposing deletion 1 minute after creation is unacceptable - it should have been tagged for improvement particularly since it was written by a new editor who requires guidance. TerriersFan (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The article falls under WP:NOT, directory subsection. The initial article was even speedy-able as all it did was list contact information for the schools in question. When the user creating the article removed the CSD template and removed the contact info i decided to treat the article as an opposed prod rather then actually placing a prod or replacing the CSD (The user already contested the CSD, so he or she would likely also contest a prod).


 * I see no problems with handling an article this way. Articles are evaluated at near real time not only by me, but by the majority of the people doing newpage patrol. While i agree that i could (and should) probably have placed a prod in this case, it would still be placed a minute after creation.   Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 18:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of Seventh-day Adventist academies and elementary schools to where I have already merged the content. TerriersFan (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment following the action of TerriersFan, we are now talking about the retention of a redirect. I note that the academies are ALL redlinks, so that it is questionable whehter they should appear at all (whether in this article or where they are now).  However the question should be whether these academies are High Schools or for younger children.  The consensus is that High Schools are notable and others generally are not, and should be mereged with theri town.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. WikiScrubber (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.