Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventh Channel Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Seventh Channel Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 04:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 04:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Hi, we would need way more clarity when it comes to proposing AFDs. The article - as it stands - (i) clearly highlights the studio's credentials when it comes to film production: 20+ projects, involvement in nationally significant work like Mahabharat, work with some of India's biggest actors such as Kamal Haasan and Vijay. (ii) has reliable links from sources announcing notability (New Indian Express calls it "one of the early producers for TV") (iii) has organised notable events which have lasted for over a decade (the International Tamil Film Awards and the Tamil Nadu Film Festival]). It also meets the criteria for WP:NACTOR through its work if production studios are included. Neutral Fan (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , I acknowledge your opinion. But, I beg to differ from your assessment. The primary reason - one can't use some other entities' notability as a pivot for another entity's page. Independent merit matters. - Hatchens (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per User:Neutral Fan, there seems to be enough evidence to support notability, and nom makes no effective case to the contrary. Ingratis (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - per User:Neutral Fan Donaldd23 (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is WP:NCORP and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. Also nothing that points to inherited notability such as being involved in well-known productions, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.