Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Severe asthmatic cystic respiratory fibromyalgia distress disorder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Frank  |  talk  17:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Severe asthmatic cystic respiratory fibromyalgia distress disorder

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research, unsourced. Brianga (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. This appears to have been written someone looking for medical information. It admits that it doesn't describe a real disease, and the whole thing is original research and highly unencyclopedic. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:OR. Deor (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not to be too pedantic, but the criterion is WP:NOT rather than WP:OR itself - but the article fails it, whatever its abbreviation.  Tevildo (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not to be too pedantic, but WP:OR (that is, No original research) is the official WP policy page on the matter. Deor (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete this page will be orphaned soon.Point 1 for Delete: With a name like Severe asthmatic cystic respiratory fibromyalgia distress disorder it isn't going to be visited by anyone, making it orphaned. Point 2: This page is just a medical book explanation. Point 3: Who notable enough to be on Wikipedia has had it? Point 4: Is it actually a notable disorder in its own right? Yes, I know this is a long one, but it doesn't really tick any boxes. A bloke called AndrewConvosMy Messies 19:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Re-read it, and it just looks like a diary entry made into an article, and the disorder doesn't actually exist. "He has condition X". That means it will never be ready to put on this encyclopaedia anyway. A bloke called AndrewConvosMy Messies 19:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  —WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - made up one day, "not yet" recognized by science. Bearian (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Alternatively, redirect to Münchausen syndrome by proxy. Bearian (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as totally and avowedly unencyclopedic unsourced essay. Possibly SNOW. DGG (talk) 07:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. WP:SNOW anyone? --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:45, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no reason to think it's a hoax, but it's absolutely unsourced original research, suitable for a blog or discussion forum maybe, but not for an encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.