Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewa Dynasty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star  Mississippi  14:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Sewa Dynasty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A legendary dynasty that fails WP:GNG. Trivial mentions in census documents as part of folklore. Redirect to History of Balochistan. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 23:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ref #1 in the article is a book, not a census document as claimed by the nom and appears to have more than a passing mention, also claimed by the nom. There is more than a passing mention in other books such as Comprehensive Balochistan General Knowledge.  If the article can't be expanded beyond what we currently have, then find somewhere to merge it to.  Legends and myths from ancient times should be part of the foundations of any general encyclopaedia. SpinningSpark 19:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * A book on "general knowledge" aimed at civil services aspirants is not a reliable source for topics of ancient history. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That might be a problem if mythology actually was ancient history. SpinningSpark 14:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect though there is little to merge to Sibi, where there is a section on history. Even if this is solely based on tradition, there is no harm in including it in WP, though with suitable qualifying comments on the reliability of the information.  However any article should be about the polity ruled, not about the ruling dynasty.  This would not apply if the area ruled was a handful of villages and/or subject to the suzerainty of a larger state.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Honestly, we do not have any material to merge apart from a single line even if we agree to use highly questionable sources. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.