Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewersam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 22:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Sewersam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of a previously deleted article - SewerSAM. &mdash; Egghead06 (talk) 02:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No better than spam. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability whatsoever.  — daranz [ t ] 15:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Adamc714 (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Capricious comments in AFD discussions without any rationale are dismissed without consideration. Toddst1 (talk) 16:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No claim of notability in the unreferenced article and no evidence found from searches. AllyD (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Did a google search and found no reference of this software. It may exist but is not yet notable enough to warrant its own article. Gsingh (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete — There's no coverage in unrelated reliable sources of this subject, so it fails WP:GNG readily. Coverage aside, I love the vagueness of the text. JFHJr (㊟) 21:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.