Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The only policy-based arguments made here were merge or delete. Since the AfD on the author has been closed as delete, merge isn't really an option. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a book that is not important or significant. Damiens .rf 15:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails every facet of WP:BK Livitup (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not important or significant. Not sure the author is, either. Skinny87 (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Damiens, I'm Ed Williams. Glad to know you're the arbiter of what's important. I would rather you take the article down, it's not like it brings me one extra dollar. Good luck to you, you should be truly proud of yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.139.224 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Ed, this debate shouldn't be taken personally as any kind of judgement against yourself or your work. It is merely a debate to decide if it belongs in Wikipedia according to the notability guidelines, which require multiple reliable sources published by third parties in detail about this specific subject (in this case, the book). Thank you and all the best.--Les boys (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Les, thanks. Y'all might as well remove this as my regular Wiki listing was deleted as well. There are also references to me on the Kay Parker, Juliette, Georgia, Milledgeville, Georgia and Bachman-Turner Overdrive listings that y'all will want to clean up.

There are no hard feelings - the best to you all.

Ed Williams

Comment author is Ed Williams (novelist), which for some reason had been made into a redirect to someone else. DuncanHill (talk) 12:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC) To Ed Williams' I have restored the article about you, and corrected the links in the article about the book and at Milledgville and Juliette, I couldn't find a mention of you at BTO or Kay Parker. DuncanHill (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It was made into a redirect because the article on the novelist has been deleted (due to lack of notability). The version you "restored" is now also up for deletion. --Damiens .rf 14:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't deleted . It was turned into a redirect and then prodded because it was a redirect to the wrong person. DuncanHill (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Clarify: Ed Williams (novelist) used to be a redirect to Ed Williams. But since Ed Williams was deleted, Ed Williams (actor) was moved to Ed Williams and Ed Williams (novelist) was proded. The bad redirect was a misproduct of the move. --Damiens .rf 16:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Ed Williams (novelist). -- brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 23:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Trivial book--presently held in only 24 worldcat libraries, almost all of them in Georgia. Local interest only. Unimportant publisher.I doubt very much if the author is notable either, as I can find no other book of his in worldCat, except an even less notable sequel. DGG (talk) 06:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.