Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex + Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Sex + Love

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Premature article, per WP:NALBUMS. No confirmed tracklist. No confirmed release date (only a tweet by the artist, nothing by the label or any distribution channel). &mdash;Kww(talk) 19:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Redirect to Enrique Iglesias. I did this before but a user I keep having problems brought this article and I didn't think it was the edit war. Erick (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The track listing seems to have been confirmed by Wal-Mart. Erick (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The album is coming out in March, leave it up is my suggestion, if movies (example Finding Dory that is not out till 2016) that are not released until months or years later with little to no information given can keep their pages, the same should apply to albums! No track list? who cares if nots out yet, it will be soon, and all the singles have been associated with this album. Everything in this article is true anyways! No need to delete, when its just going to be added in a month with what just a track list added with everything else thats on here already? Thats just what I think, if it gets deleted it will just be put back up next month so whats the point in deleting it now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.180.140 (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Other stuff exists is not a valid reason to keep an article. 2) Upcoming albums are supposed have to the name, release, and full track listing in order to have its own article, as pointed out on Kww's link. Erick (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep Delete (even temporarily) - the issue is not whether it will exist or not but whether it passes WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. The latter is going to be difficult before it is released but things can still pass WP:GNG if coverage of the subject prior to its release is substantial enough. In this case, I don't think it is yet. Given the suggested release date, that may well change very soon. But until then, this article was created WP:TOOSOON. Stalwart 111  08:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hadn't seen instances of coverage since located by Carrite. That's enough for me to change my !vote. Stalwart 111  23:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Non-Notable, Finding Dory has a lot of anticipation among other things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russianarmy13 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Billboard is COVERING IT, this isn't a speculative venture at this point, it is merely an article up before the official release date. Even if the album were canceled tomorrow morning, this would still be a topic which would pass GNG. Use common sense here. Carrite (talk) 01:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Carrite. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - This album now has a tracklisting and release date Paul237 (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - The album has an official track listing and release date now. And it's pointless to delete it now, when it will be remade in less than a month from now. Contactman7 (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.