Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex abuse cases in American public schools (Florida)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Sex abuse cases in American public schools (Florida)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

AfDs for articles very simialr to this one. This would be the same case. jonathan (talk — contribs) 21:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - these articles are WP:COATRACKs for BLP and NOTNEWS violations. 1of3 22:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to violate WP:NPOV and WP:COATRACK - Ben 02:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I am changing my vote after reading WP:NOTNancyHeise 04:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I lack the knowledge of this subject to post an informed "vote", however if this article is kept it will need to be policed constantly in order to ensure that not only are all names listed are properly sourced from major news organizations, but that the links themselves are still current given that many news-related links tend to either go dead after a period of time or go behind "subscription walls". This will also have to be policed contstantly to prevent the fivolous addition of names; I recommend the article be locked to all but admin-level editors with additions approved before being added (otherwise you could have kids adding names just to be "funny"). Failure to do any of this, particularly with regards to individuals charged or alleged but not actually convicted in a court of law, would become a major libel issue. Same recommendation goes for any similar article referenced above (or below). 23skidoo 15:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is anonymous answering WP:BLP. Student7 21:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid deletion criterion.  Corvus cornix 22:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete even were anonymity possible to everyone's satisfaction, listing every person of a particular type who has committed a particular crime just isn't encyclopedic - it's the basis of original research and does nothing to reflect the significant opinions of experts on the subject. We're not a database of cases from which to build theories or launch campaigns. -- SiobhanHansa 00:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.