Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and Shopping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Sex and Shopping

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable documentary. Ye old Google test yields 197 results for "'Sex and Shopping" documentary -wikipedia" . The first is an IMDb listing, the next is about sex and shopping, not the documentary. Then you have a few sites selling the video, then a couple more database hits, and then you get into the articles that are in no way related. Consequentially 06:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I can imagine that someone would want to look this up, and the article is okay. &larr;BenB4 07:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - it was aired on the BBC, which establishes notability. In case that wasn't enough, it was the source of some controversy in the news. Crystallina 07:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject seems to have more than trivial coverage in secondary sources, the controversy as reported by the BBC, and a number of documentary google hits. Passes the notability bar. – Dreadstar  †  08:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep --PEAR (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Why, this is not a vote. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 11:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it's notable because it aired on the BBC. --PEAR (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, nomination fails WP:GOOGLE in first sentence alone. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 11:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral While it is notable, I have WP:NOT concerns Corpx 17:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.