Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and The City 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete-- JForget  23:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Sex and The City 2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

failed deleted w/o discussion prod: violation of WP:CRYSTAL and this one-liner "announcement" is also a violation of WP:NOT. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 02:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, lets wait for one of: a title, a director, a plot, a single confirmed actor, a logo, anything that the Cars 2 page has.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 02:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd have to say that just an announcement that the sequel is going to happen is pointless and not worthy of inclusion until someone can actually provide useful information about it. If a person came to Wikipedia looking for information about the new movie all they would receive is a confirmation that the movie exists which is hardly encyclopedic. Atyndall93 | talk 03:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  03:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete confirmation of plans to someday start beginning to film a movie if a script materializes and the actors agree is not enough. This is a future film. JJL (talk) 03:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:NFF.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete until there is something to actually say about it. Wikipedia is not a news bureau. J I P  | Talk 06:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete but with that one citation, a comment (with footnote) can be added to the current Sex and the City (movie and tv) articles, although I recommend couching that comment with uncertainty (e.g. "as of X date one news site reported that X is in the works, although no details have been announced") Markeer 12:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with the film article for now and create a redirect until more firm information is released. The fact a sequel is being planned has been reported in "non-trivial" sources - I Googled and found a report in the Globe & Mail, for example - but then again non-trivial sources also reported that Jim Carrey was going to star in a movie version of The Six Million Dollar Man five years ago, too, and that Sean Connery had filmed a guest appearance in Die Another Day. Plans change. 23skidoo (talk) 14:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete According to WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. Until we can confirm through reliable sources that filming has begun, this subject does not deserve its own article. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and the notability guidelines for future films since this announced sequel has not begun filming. Films that are announced are never guaranteed to begin filming.  There could be budget issues, script issues, salary issues, or interference of an actors' strike.  Only recreate if filming begins.  In the meantime, add relevant details to a "Sequel" section at Sex and the City: The Movie. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 15:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for now until there is confirmation of such a title.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  15:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF. No guarantee that this will even film. Steve  T • C 15:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Look how many years it took to make the X-Files sequel. Alientraveller (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.