Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexasaurus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Sexasaurus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Was redirected to R.Kelly but User:Padillah has objected. Not a notable concept on its own. Gigs (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - The only basis I have found for this is a single lyric in one song refering to himself as a Sexasaurus. This is in no way a wide spread colloquial for the artist and has no reason to exist as a redirect. Padillah (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable neologism. Gobonobo  T C 18:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable. In fact, doesn't this page meet WP:CSD G3? Akerans (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No. It's not a hoax. Gigs (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete — Non-notable neologism.  m o n o   23:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 01:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.