Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SexoMercadoBCN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 01:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

SexoMercadoBCN

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable spam article likely created in violation of the terms of use by a undeclared paid editor based on behavioral evidence. Its excluded by both points of WP:N: none of the existing sourcing that is available meets our requirements in WP:NCORP, and it is written solely to promote the entity itself, making it fail WP:NOTSPAM. In short: Wikipedia is not a venue for you to advertise a non-notable commercial sex forum. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

SexoMercadoBCN spanish impact on the activity is quite comparable to the The_Erotic_Review site in the US. --Pulpoman.smb (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. (I am a fluent Spanish speaker/reader.) I assessed the sources for this article and they are misleading as presented in the article. The only truly reliable source present is this article in El Mundo, but that source does not mention the article subject. I'm open to changing my position if someone arrives before the end of the week with good sources but as it stands, this article completely fails WP:N.  A  Train talk 21:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Samantha Villar confirmed that she documented there her book in the forum with a registered user in this post. --Pulpoman.smb (talk) 13:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * User:Pulpoman.smb has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above lacks third party sources.Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.