Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sextology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 05:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Sextology
Dictionary definition of neologism; article itself notes that searches do not find subject. Only encyclopedic content is that there are really six books in The Lord of the Rings, which is almost certainly elsewhere.Septentrionalis 05:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not transwiki Nominator vote. Septentrionalis 05:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't transwiki. A quick google and dict. search returns nothing related to this meaning. &mdash; Graibeard(talk) 00:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 23:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable neologism. -- Krash (Talk) 16:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle 21:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. (Ibaranoff24 01:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.