Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual Harassment Panda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Pablo  Talk  |  Contributions  00:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Sexual Harassment Panda

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated this article for deletion per Wikipedia's policy for articles regarding specific episodes of a TV Series such as Critic Reviews and Characters involved etc. This page has been edited several times with little or no change towards complying with WP:EPISODE. --Amaraiel 16:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep - I think that the article can be worked upon to help bring it to correct standards - not to mention that there are many episodes that have less content than this, South Park or not. I hardly see this as a reason to delete a single episode out of the many on this list, or across Wikipedia for that matter. ≈  The Haunted Angel  01:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - cant see any reason for the opposite.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insatiable56 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep with no prejudice to merge - WP:EPISODE asks that people do not list episode articles for AFD and instead urge editors to engage in merge discussions. Will (talk) 13:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - Needs some cleaning up, but deleting is not a solution. -- En dl ess Dan  13:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep per above. Rocket000 19:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the comments above, do not harm the Sexual Harassment Panda under any circumstances.  Bur nt sau ce  22:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Needed cleanup is not a reason for article deletion. You're making Sexual Harassment Panda sad. --SarekOfVulcan 23:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. And when one little panda puts his furry little AfD in another panda's Article, that makes me a very sad panda. {Panda Suit{67.188.106.35}} —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per above. This could definitely be expanded upon, as I am starting to see more and more references outside of the one episode. Turlo Lomon 09:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Need for cleanup means you should clean up, not propose AfD.  Bacchiad 13:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.