Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual frustration

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was sent to Copyright problems for resolution. Rossami (talk) 02:25, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sexual frustration

 * 1) Nonsense.
 * 2) A how-to.
 * 3) Original research. RickK


 * How-to. Original research.  Also, I suspect, an attempt at humor.  Delete.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 08:22, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'll edit this right down to a coherent article later today. If I do not get round to it, then delete it. --Oldak Quill 08:29, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't edit the article. It's a Copyvio.  I've sent it to copyright problems. Uncle G 13:24, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.