Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual intercourse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN.  Sandstein  17:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Sexual intercourse

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent 3rd party sources can be used to verify that this concept is real. Either someone has participated in this act and is therefore a first party to the act or has not participated in the act and therefore cannot be a realiable source regarding the mechanics/after effects/consequences/social aspects. Hasteur (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I have sexual intercourse all the time. I know this great girl named Rosie Palms... Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It may be great that you know this, but Wikipedia depends on Verifiability, Reliable Sources, and Pixie Dust to determine if we should have an article for a topic. Hasteur (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Think of the children!!!!!11!!!11!!!one!!!eleven -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh. And I'm a straight guy with no girlfriend, and I don't have sex.  So everyone should share my misery. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I heard they keep 'em, girls, I mean, in this place called "outside". I haven't been there yet, but I may go looking for it tomorrow... Oh, wait: I have to work on my article about internet addiction tomorrow. –  OhioStandard  (talk) 10:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. If the "greatest and most influential scientist who ever lived" thought it wasn't notable, who am I to argue? Clarityfiend (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm gay and desire to do this.  Dough 48  72  03:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There are reliable second-party sources --Cyber cobra (talk) 04:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Without this article Wikimedia Commons would have no further raison d'être. Carrite (talk) 05:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dennis' second comment; I share the same fate. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 06:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia is not censored. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Move to Acts for deletion/Sexual intercourse. 68.149.174.198 (talk) 10:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all keep votes seem to have a COI, as it appears they believe they were produced by an instance of this dubious phenomenon. That flies in the face of dozens of years of scientific research about how the Stork does it.--Wehwalt (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per various Buddhist theories about the endless cycle of suffering, then we might achieve Nirvana, and hey! Bob's your uncle/your sister/your stepmother/your goldfish/the clerk at Walmart/your left gonad and so on.  Captain Screebo Parley! 14:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory of behavior, biology, or other related subjects. Alternatively, redirect to Sexual Healing, because I always get that song title confused with this. postdlf (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Immoral article about an immoral topic. Wikipedia is not an advocacy site of anti-social activities.  Supernova Explosion   Talk  15:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.